He has all the answers, knows just what the church needs to do in order to grow and is certain that the church will follow his lead. They better. They need him. Without him, that church can not thrive.
A new worship program, a new youth program, a church building renovation project to modernize the worship center and a half-dozen new paid staff positions... the plan can not fail.
He can already see the praise band, the people singing, hands lifted up to the Lord. He can already see himself leading a staff meeting, preaching from the new pulpit, utilizing state of the art multi-media displays to accentuate his Sunday morning message.
Oh, but wait! What's this? The church voted down his plan for church revitalization? WHY? What gives? Who do these people think they are? Why they must be a bunch of Pharisees stuck in their traditions... more in love with their traditions than they are with reaching people.
Furiously, he rips into them, decrying their dead works of tradition and telling them that they'll never grow until they get with it. Furiously, he storms out the door. Will he be back? Will they be back? Has God been honored in this situation? Did the preacher even consult the Lord? Did the Lord answer? If so, why did the Lord direct him to cause disorder in the church?
We have a problem in the Lord's churches today. Church growth has become a competitive sport, with some pastors ranking themselves and others based on who is able to lead their church to change and grow. It is a race of who can be the most innovative, who can use the latest techniques, vocabulary, who has the best technology, who has the latest Bible translation, and in some cases, who's worship band has signed a contract with the biggest label.
Indeed, churches have become like NFL franchises, and the pastor is the head coach. Churches have become multi-million dollar corporations, and the pastor is the CEO.
Just two small problems. (1) Many times, these carnal pastors, full of the pride of life, throw well seasoned Christians, men and women who have served the Lord faithfully their entire lives, under the bus, calling them hypocrites, pharisees, and challenging their faith. This is done in the name of "change," "progress," and "reaching the unreached." The other problem, (2) GOD NEVER CALLED ANY MAN TO REMAKE THE CHURCH AFTER HIS OWN IMAGE!
These type of pastors have as much love for seasoned Christians and long-term church members as Rush Limbaugh has for Nancy Pelosi. They see these aging deacons, ladies auxiliary officers and Sunday school teachers as obstacles to overcome in order to obtain church growth. There is a certain amount of animosity from progressives toward these Christians. The fact that animosity is in place is evidence of a spiritual problem on the part of the progressive pastor, not the church member. While this type of pastor may feel that the church member is more in love with the traditions than the Lord, the fact is this type of pastor is more in love with his new ideas than he is the church member.
1 John 2:9 says "He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now." Don't sit there and criticize, run down, and complain about your church members, your brothers and sisters in Christ, then try to tell me how spiritual you are. You are not, and your attitude and the Bible bear witness to that fact.
Secondly, if you truly want to have a successful ministry, one that God will reward, you need to remember what your role is. Ephesians 4:12 says your work is the perfecting of the saints for the work of the ministry, and the edifying of the body of Christ (the local church). If you want to see true church growth, perfect your saints. That means to equip them for the work of the ministry, which is making disciples (evangelism and teaching).
Furthermore, 2 Timothy 4:5 says "Do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry." Did God truly call you to preach the Gospel? Then why are you not soul-winning? Do you really want to reach the unreached? Why aren't you knocking on their doors.
The work of a pastor is to train the church to do the Great Commission (which is soul-winning, baptizing and teaching, not total change and cosmetic appeal), and to do the Great Commission himself, not to remake the church after his own image.
Why do I bring all this up? Why did I go on this rant? Why?
Because I, for one, and tired of hearing news about a church split where a pastor thought he had to effect a bunch of change to reach new people. I'm tired of hearing how that church was divided and torn apart because the pastor insisted on ramming his agenda through business meeting. I'm tired of hearing about believers being wounded by pastors who degrade them for not "getting with it." I'm tired of it!
I am not anti-Contemporary worship. However, Contemporary worship never won a single soul to the Lord (neither did traditional.) The preaching of the Gospel and the work of evangelists have won multitudes of souls for the Lord. A new worship center can not win souls, but a spirit-filled preacher can. A cool, hip approach to church can not welcome a visitor like a church where there is a sweet spirit.
Brethren, it is time to quit wasting time and churches on this nonsense and get back to basics. Evangelism and teaching. May God bless you where you minister.
God uses life's circumstances to transform us into the persons He intended on us being. Here's my journey...
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Sorting Through Revelation: Chapter 17
The great whore described in Revelation 17. |
While scripture often uses a woman to symbolize a religious movement (the woman in the ephah in Zechariah 5, the woman that hid leaven in three measures of meal in Matthew 13:33), Revelation 17:18 says that the woman John saw (the great whore) is "that great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth."
The ABA Sunday School Adult Lesson Commentary states "The angel's description of the woman as 'that great city which reigneth over the kings of the earth' (verse 18) is a lead-in to the account of the destruction of Babylon, which is related in (Revelation) Chapter 18." The commentary goes on to state that the false religion system reigned over the kings of the earth because of the wealth and influence it controlled.
The destruction comes, then, when the kings decide they've had enough of the false religion's influence and confiscate the property and imprison or kill the leaders of the religion. While all of this seems fairly logical, I'm not sure it really hits the nail on the head (and I'm not sure anyone can, there is a reason one of her titles is "MYSTERY.")
Going back to the hermeneutics rule that women in scripture represent religion or religious movements, and including the fact that the angel in Revelation 17 specifically designates the great whore as representing "that great city (Babylon)," one has to conclude that the great whore is, in fact, the city of Babylon, with it's wealth, influence, prestige, attractiveness, and with its heavy religious influence.
Babylon the great will be a prosperous city, despite the death and destruction that takes place during the tribulation leading up to God's wrath. It will be the seat of the Anti-Christ, which means that it will be the most influential city on earth at the time. The power and influence of being the Anti-Christ's seat will undoubtedly contribute to the prosperity of the city, but the city will be more than just a futuristic New York City, Washington, London or Tokyo. It will be a city of power, prosperity, and religious movements, most notably that of the false prophet.
All of these traits are captured with the picture of the great whore. She is riding on the back of the beast (influence), she is very attractive (prosperity, John marvelled at her) and she is a woman, symbolic of religion. In the end time, Babylon will be THE hub of false religion.
Zechariah 5:6-11 says:
This is an ephah that goeth forth. He said moreover, this is their resemblance through all the earth. And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah. And he said, this is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof. Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings, for they had wings like the wings of a stork, and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven. Then said I unto the angel that talked with me, whither do these bear the ephah? And he said to me, to build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established, and set there upon her own base.The woman in the ephah, as well as the two women with stork's wings represent wickedness, which is often synonymous with false religion. The two women with stork's wings bear the other woman in the ephah to the land of Shinar to build it (wickedness and false religion) a house there.
The restored palace at Babylon, photo taken in 2003. |
This revitalized Babylon (which might become prosperous as the international community becomes involved in rebuilding it following the Iraq war, plus economic opportunity could give way to commercial development) will become the hub for false religion.
So, in the final days of Babylon, it's not just the world capital, or the world trade center, but it is also the religious center of the world. The false religious roots in the city will run as deep, if not deeper than any of the city's other traits.
So why, if the great whore represents the city of Babylon, power, prosperity and religion, would the kings of the earth devour her, seeing how they made a fortune off her (Revelation 18)? Simple. Revelation 17:17 says God will put it into their hearts to fulfill his will. Also, they may think that by conquering her, they can take over her power, wealth and influence, and rid themselves of the religion.
Ironic, huh? God overthrows Babylon, and uses the kings and people of the earth who took advantage of her wealth and power to do so. It will be done quickly and with much violence, but the battle isn't over yet. The kings, Anti-Christ and false prophet re-emerge in Chapter 19 to make war with the Lamb.
Now this is the way I am interpreting this passage, and I have found that no matter how long Bible scholars study Revelation, they all come up with a different interpretation. Which means that of all the men that have studied this their entire lives, most, if not all, will be incorrect in some of their interpretations and conclusions.
Which is why, knowing that I will likely fall into the "missed the interpretation" category in some respect, I welcome well thought out responses to my posting on this passage, so that I may have my iron sharpened and learn a little bit. What do you say?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)